Appendix A: Table of statements
Mixed status: the first status bears on the facts or the calculation, the second on the reading attached to them.
| No. | Statement | Status | Ch. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Identity = Life = Consciousness: one phenomenon, three angles | L | 1 |
| 1.2 | Three ruptures: Augustine, Descartes (1641), emergentism and Chalmers (1995) | F | 1 |
| 1.3 | The Augustinian separation, cultural licence for exploitation | L | 1 |
| 1.4 | Common grammar of the ruptures: decomposing while forgetting closure; they announce 9 ≡ 0 | L | 1 |
| 1.5 | Point measurement (legitimate decimal) and cadastral relation (closed) | L | 1 |
| 1.6 | 22/7 and 1836 as relations, 3.14159… and 1836.15267 as artefacts | L | 1 |
| 1.7 | Chain Stevin, Gauss, Cauchy-Weierstrass, Cantor, Copenhagen, ZFC, Chalmers | L (jalons F) | 1 |
| 1.8 | Descartes separates, Gauss mathematises, Napoleon statises, Darwin humanises | L | 1 |
| 1.9 | Reading-inscription = consciousness, by four arguments | L | 1 |
| 1.10 | Logical regression: the grammar is carried by the entity itself | L | 1 |
| 1.11 | Adaptation = reading; denying reading is a performative contradiction | L | 1 |
| 1.12 | Animal and plant learning: reading-inscription precedes language | L | 1 |
| 1.13 | Reading-inscription operates by cadastral subtraction | L | 1 |
| 1.14 | Independent convergence of the four angles | L | 1 |
| 1.15 | Five derivations: ontological, biological, phenomenological, cadastral, epistemic | L | 1 |
| 1.16 | The hard problem rendered void by restored closure | L | 1 |
| 2.1 | Axiom A0: the nine positions precede any base | L | 2 |
| 2.2 | Double symmetry of the circle: 6 first common, 9 = 3 × 3 first complete closure | L (étapes Th) | 2 |
| 2.3 | Nonagon: angle 140° = 4 × 5 × 7, sum 1260° = 7 × 180° | Th | 2 |
| 2.4 | Meeting of 9, 7 and 180° in one equality, read as a signature | L | 2 |
| 2.5 | Diametral symmetry k ↦ 9 − k: the four pairs | Th | 2 |
| 2.6 | Plane symmetry precedes arithmetic involution | L | 2 |
| 2.7 | Chords of step 3: three triangles {3,6,9}, {1,4,7}, {2,5,8} = the three rails | Th | 2 |
| 2.8 | The bases of civilisations agree with the structure; ten fingers explain neither 60 nor 20 | L | 2 |
| 2.9 | Barycentre of the pairs and of 1, …, 8: 4.5 | Th | 2 |
| 2.10 | Table of pairs: gaps 7, 5, 3, 1; products 8, 14, 18, 20; Axis 162, root 9 | Th | 2 |
| 2.11 | Invariance under change of base, geometric priority | L | 2 |
| 3.1 | Atomic matryoshka: roots of 1836, 207, 3477 = 9, 9, 3 | L (chiffres Th, F) | 3 |
| 3.2 | Consciousness is released by an interplay of atoms, not produced | L | 3 |
| 3.3 | The cancer cell: atoms intact, global closure lost | L | 3 |
| 3.4 | Operative criterion with three conditions: structural modification, coherence, no external rewriting | L | 3 |
| 3.5 | Thermostat, photodiodes, program fail; bacterium, plant, animal, human satisfy | L | 3 |
| 3.6 | Binary criterion, immune to Aaronson's critique of IIT | L | 3 |
| 3.7 | Adaptive intelligence and phenomenological consciousness: two faces of one operation | L | 3 |
| 3.8 | Reid-Butler (the amnesiac remains himself), Parfit (duplication impossible) | L | 3 |
| 3.9 | Consciousness = self-observation during the relation; the other never directly accessible | L | 3 |
| 3.10 | Reading the outside and reading oneself are the same operation | L | 3 |
| 3.11 | Husserlian intentionality refined: the correlation operates within the system | L | 3 |
| 3.12 | The three conditions and self-observation | L | 3 |
| 3.13 | Consciousness as wave reflection on the boundary of closure | L | 3 |
| 3.14 | The three conditions as conditions of reflection | L | 3 |
| 3.15 | Closure is the measure, the return is the measured, judgement their relation | L | 3 |
| 3.16 | Formalising the reflection analogy | Chantier | 3 |
| 3.17 | Interface 11 and Axis {3, 6, 9} as components of reflection | L, Chantier | 3 |
| 3.18 | Consciousness = interface 11 and Axis simultaneously active in an active closure | L | 3 |
| 3.19 | Demonstrating the equivalence of the three conditions and the activation 11 / {3,6,9} | Chantier | 3 |
| 3.20 | Three additions not inscribed: screens and empathy; 11 → 14; 14 = 9 + 5 | Chantier | 3 |
| 4.1 | Combination problem (Coleman 2014, Chalmers 2017) | F | 4 |
| 4.2 | Third operation: subtraction; (1, 8) gives 9 | L | 4 |
| 4.3 | D-T fusion: defect 0.01888 u, 17.6 MeV | F, Th | 4 |
| 4.4 | Fusion as physically measured cadastral subtraction | L | 4 |
| 4.5 | Dissociation energy of H₂: 4.478 eV | F | 4 |
| 4.6 | 4.478 eV as expression of the relation 4.5 | L | 4 |
| 4.7 | Binding maximum in the iron-nickel region (Ni-62, then Fe-58, Fe-56) | F | 4 |
| 4.8 | Ni-Co-Fe: roots 1, 9, 8; sum 81 = 9²; gradient 198; g = 9.81 | Th, L | 4 |
| 4.9 | Mass subtraction and cadastral subtraction: one operation, two readings | L | 4 |
| 4.10 | Resolution of the combination problem by subtraction | L | 4 |
| 4.11 | Convergence of nuclear transitions towards iron, read as confirmation | F | 4 |
| 4.12 | Root conserved in fission (n + ²³⁵U → ¹⁴⁴Ba + ⁸⁹Kr + 3 n, 236 = 236, root 2), reach: conservation of nucleons | Th | 4 |
| 4.13 | No fourth generation of particles | P | 4 |
| 4.14 | Tsirelson 2√2 = 4 × ½ × √2 (reference to Volume 7) | Th | 4 |
| 4.15 | Rotation curves without dark matter: NGC 3198, SPARC to be validated | P | 4 |
| 4.16 | ARC as a research programme in the sense of Lakatos | L | 4 |
| 5.1 | The figure The Star of Life (April 2026) and its caption | F | 5 |
| 5.2 | Golden ratio of the pentagon, octagon of the two squares, F₅ = 5 and F₆ = 8, pivot 4.5 | Th | 5 |
| 5.3 | The pieces of the axiom were already in the corpus | L | 5 |
| 5.4 | Axiom: consciousness is the whirling of the form within the frame 8 | L | 5 |
| 5.5 | Neither drawing without frame, nor empty cell: consciousness is the form that dwells by turning | L | 5 |
| 5.6 | The whirling crosses the pivot 4.5 (Theorem 4.1 of the octet) | L | 5 |
| 5.7 | Cogito ergo sum (1637) | F | 5 |
| 5.8 | Relation → Tension → Connection → Reflection → Thought: thought is fifth | L | 5 |
| 5.9 | Volvor ergo sum | L | 5 |
| 5.10 | Copenhagen, Bohr, Heisenberg, Wigner, von Neumann | F | 5 |
| 5.11 | The external observer, Cartesian heritage made compulsory by the arithmetic cut | L | 5 |
| 5.12 | The observer is the rotor; collapse is the stabilisation of the whirling | L | 5 |
| 5.13 | Walking, proprioceptive rotor | L | 5 |
| 5.14 | The heart, sinus rotor; roots 6, 7, 8 for 60, 70, 80 only | L | 5 |
| 5.14 bis | The heart twists a strand from within and propels; helix of fibres, torsion, fractals | L, F | 5 |
| 5.15 | Breathing, alveolar rotor; roots 3 and 9 for 12 and 18 | L | 5 |
| 5.16 | Human consciousness, convergence of three rotors | L | 5 |
| 5.17 | The basic grammar is closed; consolidation remains | L | 5 |
| 6.1 | All persistence requires a material inscription | L | 6 |
| 6.2 | The framework does not promise paradise; three premises | L | 6 |
| 6.3 | Nothing is lost, everything sediments and returns enriched | L | 6 |
| 6.4 | Disappearance is impossible; death is a phase transition | L | 6 |
| 6.5 | Life, connection of two minimal movements (P0) | L | 6 |
| 6.6 | Rock, the living in waiting | L | 6 |
| 6.7 | A man dies, the vine, the drinker: nothing is lost | L | 6 |
| 6.8 | Innate talents, strong biological memory | L | 6 |
| 6.9 | Content of talents: inscriptions accumulated by the cycles | L | 6 |
| 6.10 | Activation by joint reading (Mozart and the keyboard) | L | 6 |
| 6.11 | Human life, a moment of intense activation between two dormancies | L | 6 |
| 6.12 | "One day, or in death, we are reconciled" | L | 6 |
| 6.13 | Life is a controlled fall; man relays reality to the next | L | 6 |
| 6.14 | The serpent in the Russian doll | L | 6 |
| 6.15 | Equivalence as ontological simplification, not a mystical thesis | L | 6 |
| 7.1 | Love, third term released by mutual subtraction | L | 7 |
| 7.2 | The residue sediments in both bodies | L | 7 |
| 7.3 | Love at first sight and mature love | L | 7 |
| 7.4 | Love is the sedimented point that joins two feelings where they subtracted each other | L | 7 |
| 7.5 | What is missing is not the other but the state the other triggered | L | 7 |
| 7.6 | Love survives separations without being a ghost | L | 7 |
| 7.7 | Loves without subtraction fade | L | 7 |
| 7.8 | The guilt of loving for what the other brings is unfounded | L | 7 |
| 7.9 | Saudade, active presence of absence, reading of the sedimented points | L | 7 |
| 8.1 | Darwin restored is not Darwin denied; ARC a strangler fig | L | 8 |
| 8.2 | Two seeds, two places; no less fit in the closed cycle | L | 8 |
| 8.3 | Transformation, common descent, selection: kept | F | 8 |
| 8.4 | Mendel, modern synthesis, Kimura, Eldredge-Gould, Margulis, epigenetics, transfers: kept | F | 8 |
| 8.5 | Three propositions set aside: pure chance, sufficiency of selection, absence of coherence | L | 8 |
| 8.6 | Darwin, sixth amputation of the genealogy | L | 8 |
| 8.7 | Structure first, variation within, selection between | L | 8 |
| 8.8 | 20³⁰⁰ ≈ 10³⁹⁰; 13.8 Ga ≈ 4.4 × 10¹⁷ s; structured effective space | Th, L | 8 |
| 8.9 | Non-uniform mutations (hot spots, transitions, CpG, repair, Monroe 2022) | F, L | 8 |
| 8.10 | Quasi-universal and robust genetic code (Crick 1968, Freeland-Hurst 1998) | F, L | 8 |
| 8.11 | Convergences: camera eye, flight, echolocation, C4 | F, L | 8 |
| 8.12 | Major transitions as phase transitions | F, L | 8 |
| 8.13 | Six universal invariants and their correspondences | F, L | 8 |
| 8.14 | L-homochirality, pre-existing cadastral orientation | F, L | 8 |
| 8.15 | Histone H4: 2 out of 102 in 1.5 Ga; prior space of variations | F, L | 8 |
| 8.16 | The camera eye, attractive position | F, L | 8 |
| 8.17 | Flight, four times, constrained by aerodynamics | F, L | 8 |
| 8.18 | Molecular convergence: few viable configurations | F, L | 8 |
| 8.19 | Cambrian: 20 to 25 Ma, base at 538.8 Ma; 35 to 36 phyla | F | 8 |
| 8.20 | 36 = 6²; the phyla close the space of animal body plans | L | 8 |
| 8.21 | The Cambrian as a phase transition opened by the environment | L | 8 |
| 8.22 | Eukaryotes, multicellularity (≥ 25 times), nervous system, language | F, L | 8 |
| 8.23 | Symbiogenesis: evolution by fusion | F, L | 8 |
| 8.24 | Horizontal transfers; 8 % of the human genome retroviral | F, L | 8 |
| 8.25 | Transgenerational epigenetics; Lamarck partly rehabilitated | F, L | 8 |
| 8.26 | Five mass extinctions (443, 372, 252, 201, 66 Ma) | F | 8 |
| 8.27 | Five = central position; extinction as involution | L | 8 |
| 8.28 | Sixth extinction, 100 to 1000 times the background rate | F, L | 8 |
| 8.29 | Four operators of evolution | L | 8 |
| 8.30 | Measurable structural biases in the distribution of mutations | P | 8 |
| 8.31 | Specific structures convergent, neutral structures rarely | P | 8 |
| 8.32 | No new major phylum | P | 8 |
| 8.33 | Neither creationism nor intelligent design | L | 8 |
| 9.1 | Not prescribing: holding back the gesture where error costs more than correctness yields | L | 9 |
| 9.2 | The body falls under the same operator; local fractal | L | 9 |
| 9.3 | Cell, organ, body: three scales, one operator | L | 9 |
| 9.4 | Hippocrates, Huangdi Neijing, Paracelsus: traces | F, L | 9 |
| 9.5 | Four locks: identification, reversibility, validation, posture | L | 9 |
| 9.6 | One prescribes in a second, one de-inscribes in a decade | L | 9 |
| 9.7 | Six signatures of medical amputation | L | 9 |
| 9.8 | Sedimentation as a primary clinical category | Chantier | 9 |
| 9.9 | Four hormonal pairs associated with the four inversion pairs | L | 9 |
| 9.10 | Linked pairs, ordered in time, closed system (declared limits) | L | 9 |
| 9.11 | Native consciousness as reference regime | L | 9 |
| 9.12 | The validation protocol to be built | Chantier | 9 |
| 9.13 | Prevention on three scales | Chantier | 9 |
| 9.14 | Senescence as frozen position 8 | F, L | 9 |
| 9.15 | Senescence factors; senolytics not prescribed | Chantier | 9 |
| 9.16 | Ageing is not an error; finite duration of the individual 9 | L | 9 |
| 9.17 | TTAGGG telomeres: programmed finitude; support on the absence of C withdrawn | F, Th, L | 9 |
| 9.18 | Autophagy; neurodegenerations as failing autophagy | F, L | 9 |
| 9.19 | What the book does and does not do | L | 9 |
| 9.20 | Two pitfalls: lying by omission, betraying the framework | L | 9 |
| 9.21 | The cadastral patient: neither diagnosis, nor object, nor case | L | 9 |
| 9.22 | Transforming medical education | Chantier | 9 |
| 9.23 | Seven inscriptions of the living | L | 9 |
| 9.24 | The silence of the body, presence of circulation | L | 9 |
| 9.25 | Cancer, suffocation of information not received, blocked (6 October 2026) | L, Chantier | 9 |
| 9.26 | The reading of cancer, granted to the open site and subject to the locks | L | 9 |
| 10.1 | R.134: death as absolute erasure is cadastrally false | L | 10 |
| 10.2 | Death as seal-zero, never exhaustion; triple release | L | 10 |
| 10.3 | The two zeros; thinking death as nothing is 9 ≡ 0 over a life | L | 10 |
| 10.4 | The 9 is the unknown, the 0 is its trace | L | 10 |
| 10.5 | The unknown is us: incomplete self-indexing | L | 10 |
| 10.6 | To know oneself is to read what one has inscribed | L | 10 |
| 10.7 | The noun fabricates an entity; the verb says the transition | L | 10 |
| 10.8 | Linguistic comparisons | F, L | 10 |
| 10.9 | Four operations of the modern amputation of death | F, L | 10 |
| 10.10 | These operations project the amputations of the corpus | L | 10 |
| 10.11 | Día de los Muertos, Bardo Thödol (49 = 7²) | F, L | 10 |
| 10.12 | Definition: cessation of operativity, persistence of inscriptions | L | 10 |
| 10.13 | The 9 does not disappear, it folds back | L | 10 |
| 10.14 | Neither positive assertion nor inverse assertion about the folded-back 9 | L | 10 |
| 10.15 | The 0 persists and operates by itself | L | 10 |
| 10.16 | The quality of a life, the quality of its 0s | L | 10 |
| 10.17 | Concordance with chapters 6 and 9 | L | 10 |
| 10.18 | Grief, learning to read the trace | F, L | 10 |
| 10.19 | Saudade, regime of mature grief | L | 10 |
| 10.20 | Ritual and anniversaries | L | 10 |
| 10.21 | Consciousness was an operation, not a substance | L | 10 |
| 10.22 | The frontier: the cadastre says nothing of the unknown | L | 10 |
| 10.23 | Avyākata, Wittgenstein, apophatic | F, L | 10 |
| 10.24 | Near-death experiences: 62 out of 344 (18 %); transition phase | F, L | 10 |
| 10.25 | Pythagoras, Epicurus and Lucretius, Buddhism, Christianity, Taoism | L | 10 |
| 10.26 | Nine generations: (½)⁹ = 1/512 ≈ 0.2 % | Th, L | 10 |
| 10.27 | Vertical and horizontal transmission | L | 10 |
| 10.28 | Transgenerational saudade | L | 10 |
| 10.29 | Synthesis of what is established | L | 10 |
| 10.30 | Three protocols (languages, grief, transmission) | P | 10 |
| 10.31 | Lucidity, restraint, the operation as purpose | L | 10 |
| 11.1 | Right signal and wrong pointer; the figure that no longer points | L | 11 |
| 11.2 | Discouragement: it believes the house is empty | L | 11 |
| 11.3 | Compression: the word-answer, exhaustion zero of meaning | L | 11 |
| 11.4 | Presentism: a reachable centre is a dead centre | L | 11 |
| 11.5 | The navel, scar of the last unchosen relation | L | 11 |
| 11.6 | Isolation is an arithmetic consequence | L | 11 |
| 11.7 | Author's decision: counterweight withdrawn (23 August 2026) | L | 11 |
| 11.8 | The YOLO figure, embodied exhaustion zero | L | 11 |
| 11.9 | The right signal, missed closure zero | L | 11 |
| 11.10 | The seal-death pours out, YOLO pours out nothing | L | 11 |
| 11.11 | Follow-ups: offers of regression, conjugate figure | Chantier | 11 |
Count (redone by script on this table): 205 statements. Single status: L 136, F 12, Th 8, P 6, Open site 9. Mixed status: 34 (F and L 24; Th and L 3; L and Open site 2; F and Th 1; F, Th and L 1; L with Th or F figures 3).
Chapter 12. The Accounting Body: intelligent overweight (piece entered word for word). The statuses are those the piece itself carries, section by section; no statement has been renumbered.