Appendix A: Table of statements
Every numbered statement of the volume, in order, with its status and chapter. The mention hypothesis flags a Reading that the source declared a Hypothesis.
| No. | Statement | Status | Ch. |
|---|---|---|---|
| É1.1 | Differentiation, working definition | L | 1 |
| É1.2 | The condition of position | L | 1 |
| É1.3 | Encoding specificity and context dependence | F | 1 |
| É1.4 | The condition of differential | L | 1 |
| É2.1 | Operational definition of consciousness | L | 2 |
| É2.2 | No act without self-observation | L | 2 |
| É2.3 | The performative contradiction | F | 2 |
| É2.4 | The third term does not close back on itself | L | 2 |
| É2.5 | There is no two-term state without production | L | 2 |
| É2.6 | The why can only be answered after the fact | L | 2 |
| É2.7 | Native consciousness operates by two-circle projection-reflection | L | 2 |
| É2.8 | The brain as a prediction system | F | 2 |
| É2.9 | Consciousness is read in its returns, not by direct introspection | L | 2 |
| É2.10 | Damasio and somatic markers | F | 2 |
| É2.11 | Consciousness is an operation, not a substrate | L | 2 |
| É2.12 | The freezing of 1633 | L | 2 |
| É2.13 | The freezing spreads to the disciplines | L | 2 |
| É2.14 | Declared solitude | F | 2 |
| É3.1 | Decision: unconscious designates only the dynamically repressed, and the separation is a thesis | L | 3 |
| É3.2 | Non-conscious processes with no hiding force | F | 3 |
| É3.3 | Central hypothesis of the treatise | L | 3 |
| É3.4 | The address becomes unidirectional: activation, return, relation | L | 3 |
| É3.5 | What is preserved is the charge, not the fidelity | L | 3 |
| É3.6 | One position, several addresses | L | 3 |
| É3.7 | What is forbidden is an unfolding, not a map | L | 3 |
| É3.8 | Addressability versus presence | L | 3 |
| É3.9 | The three phases of the operator | L | 3 |
| É3.10 | Secret, repressed, de-indexed | L | 3 |
| É3.11 | Freud, from 1915 to 1926 | F | 3 |
| É3.12 | The post is occupied; the treatise proposes a narrower test | L | 3 |
| É4.1 | The automatic is completed consciousness | L | 4 |
| É4.2 | The deposit is legitimate; the fault is to take it for the whole | L | 4 |
| É4.3 | Structural definition of automatism | L | 4 |
| É4.4 | The procedural-declarative dissociation | F | 4 |
| É4.5 | Two zeros of distinct conditions | L | 4 |
| É4.6 | The reopening of automatism by explicit attention | F | 4 |
| É4.7 | Reopening by simple perturbation, versus no reopening | P | 4 |
| É4.8 | The usurpation of zero | L | 4 |
| É4.9 | The lock | L | 4 |
| É4.10 | The key | L | 4 |
| É4.11 | The cost discriminant | P | 4 |
| É5.1 | Insufficient capacity, a global and reversible regime | L | 5 |
| É5.2 | Capacity is a variable independent of the state of the address | L | 5 |
| É5.3 | Janet, 1889 | F | 5 |
| É5.4 | Janet integrated, not competing | L | 5 |
| É5.5 | The sequence "stabilize before elaborating" becomes a structural constraint | L | 5 |
| É5.6 | Definition of experiential avoidance | F | 5 |
| É5.7 | Avoidance is a declined operation | L | 5 |
| É5.8 | Avoidance is the antechamber of erasure | L | 5 |
| É5.9 | Differential efficacy according to the stage of the material | P | 5 |
| É5.10 | Three outcomes and two transitional conditions | L | 5 |
| É5.11 | The last line describes the unit, not the accumulation | L | 5 |
| É5.12 | Second reading of the table, by the two directions of the address | L | 5 |
| É5.13 | A single temporal arrow | L | 5 |
| É5.14 | Anguish, avoidance, shame, panic: four moments of one signal | L | 5 |
| É5.15 | The anguish-panic discriminant | L | 5 |
| É6.1 | Pain and flight, a two-faced object | L | 6 |
| É6.2 | Two organs for executing withdrawal | L | 6 |
| É6.3 | One terminal state; trauma as a mode of interruption | L | 6 |
| É6.4 | The mirror of the two organs and the reading rule | L (hypothèse) | 6 |
| É6.5 | The dual representation of post-traumatic stress disorder | F | 6 |
| É6.6 | The body has a memory; a somatic inscription replays | L | 6 |
| É6.7 | Perpetual distribution and sudden distribution | L | 6 |
| É6.8 | Covariation of the two marks and fall clause | P | 6 |
| É6.9 | The body sets the threshold | L | 6 |
| É6.10 | A positive-gain loop | L | 6 |
| É6.11 | Why the body is necessary to the structure | L | 6 |
| É6.12 | Four candidate correlates of the threshold | L | 6 |
| É6.13 | The twenty-four to forty-eight hour lag, and the order of the two falls | P | 6 |
| É6.14 | Two entry points into the loop | L | 6 |
| É7.1 | Four terms to keep separate | L | 7 |
| É7.2 | Decision: the word shame, used alone, designates the non-place | L | 7 |
| É7.3 | Shame does not exist with a single term | L | 7 |
| É7.4 | It is always created before another gaze; solitary shame is a rereading | L | 7 |
| É7.5 | No mandatory originating scene: a place withdrawn, refused or made uninhabitable | L | 7 |
| É7.6 | The genus of shame is separation from the common | L | 7 |
| É7.7 | The statement about being is downstream | L | 7 |
| É7.8 | In grief, what one is separated from has gone; in shame, it has stayed | L | 7 |
| É7.9 | The way out is symmetrical to the way in | L | 7 |
| É7.10 | The criterion is the holding of the place | L | 7 |
| É7.11 | Two functions, the neutral third party and the holder, in a necessary order | L | 7 |
| É7.12 | What apologies and forgiveness accomplish | L | 7 |
| É7.13 | The holder is a position, not a person | L | 7 |
| É7.14 | Twelve-step programs read in this grammar | L | 7 |
| É7.15 | Being seen in the act of; tears received | L | 7 |
| É8.1 | The operator of the first transition is the failure of placement; shame is its product | L | 8 |
| É8.2 | Two transitions and a change of scale | L | 8 |
| É8.3 | Shame is the local unit, the unconscious the global formation | L | 8 |
| É8.4 | Constraint of attestation independent of the place of reception | L | 8 |
| É8.5 | What distinguishes shame from the merely unresolved | L | 8 |
| É8.6 | Trauma is not an alternative, but a mode of rupture | L | 8 |
| É8.7 | The canonical chain, moment by moment | L | 8 |
| É8.8 | What accumulation explains and an isolated non-place does not | L | 8 |
| É8.9 | Growth symmetry between consciousness and the unconscious | L | 8 |
| É8.10 | Where trauma is located | L | 8 |
| É8.11 | The second position can be fabricated | L | 8 |
| É8.12 | The fabricated gaze is systematically harsher than the real gaze | L | 8 |
| É8.13 | Two routes to the non-place, a single regime of maintenance | L | 8 |
| É8.14 | The unconscious as unaddressed products and their relics | L | 8 |
| É8.15 | Anticipated severity versus observed severity | P | 8 |
| É8.16 | Higher charge when the second position has never been confronted | P | 8 |
| É8.17 | What has not released its third term remains under tension | L | 8 |
| É8.18 | Two distinct lacks: the form and the channel; the symptom | L | 8 |
| É8.19 | Two ordered operations: restore the channel, then the form | L | 8 |
| É8.20 | Relics decrease when a channel becomes available | P | 8 |
| É9.1 | The gaze is the subject's own; recursion is a consequence | L | 9 |
| É9.2 | The only affect whose expression violates its function | L | 9 |
| É9.3 | Lewis, Tangney and Dearing: unacknowledged shame; being versus act | F | 9 |
| É9.4 | Scheff: the shame-about-shame loop | F | 9 |
| É9.5 | Nathanson: the four exits from shame | F | 9 |
| É9.6 | Gilbert: shame and rank | F | 9 |
| É9.7 | Proposition 5.1: the three joint conditions | L | 9 |
| É9.8 | Application to the candidates | L | 9 |
| É9.9 | The installed competitor, anguish, fails two conditions | L | 9 |
| É9.10 | The objection of annihilation anxiety: the unspeakable is not the self-forbidden | L | 9 |
| É9.11 | Clause on annihilation anxiety | P | 9 |
| É9.12 | Conclusion of the test and its place in the chain | L | 9 |
| É9.13 | Shame and disgust, two polar readings of the same relation | L (hypothèse) | 9 |
| É9.14 | The conservation of the differential | L (hypothèse) | 9 |
| É9.15 | Disgust is acquired by transmission, and its boundary is cultural | F | 9 |
| É9.16 | Two fall clauses for disgust | P | 9 |
| É9.17 | The received description in two components | L | 9 |
| É9.18 | The vergonha and the symbol | F | 9 |
| É9.19 | Corrected thesis: shame proceeds from a separation from what is one's own | L | 9 |
| É9.20 | Why childhood is the privileged site of inscription | L | 9 |
| É9.21 | The terminal stage: the victim executes the program herself | L | 9 |
| É9.22 | Shame is itself an address, the only one that cannot be erased | L | 9 |
| É9.23 | Shame is answerable: being received at eye level | L | 9 |
| É9.24 | Brown and Pennebaker | F | 9 |
| É9.25 | The reader is a position of reception, not necessarily a person present | L | 9 |
| É9.26 | Solitary writing without an address | P | 9 |
| É9.27 | Three states instead of "received shame" | L | 9 |
| É9.28 | Non-reception is the condition, recursive shame is the agent; the variable is the reader in the following hours | L | 9 |
| É9.29 | What is buried is the fair face | L | 9 |
| É9.30 | The statement about being makes counterexamples unavailable | L | 9 |
| É9.31 | Mood congruence | F | 9 |
| É9.32 | The unavailability is momentary and non-destructive | L | 9 |
| É9.33 | The Think/No-Think paradigm and its controversy | F | 9 |
| É9.34 | The exact scope of the support | L | 9 |
| É9.35 | Moderate activation weakens the trace | F | 9 |
| É9.36 | Erdelyi: a partial and reversible repression | F | 9 |
| É10.1 | Sartre and Cooley | F | 10 |
| É10.2 | The unconscious is recomputed at every relation | L (hypothèse) | 10 |
| É10.3 | Clinical antecedents: Bollas and implicit relational knowing | F | 10 |
| É10.4 | It is not only the content that is relational, it is the inaccessibility | L | 10 |
| É10.5 | The local unconscious is a condemned address | L | 10 |
| É10.6 | The global unconscious is a position made unreachable | L | 10 |
| É10.7 | Two routes to the global | L | 10 |
| É10.8 | The two levels reformulated without inner content | L | 10 |
| É10.9 | The first route, and the reduction in the opposite direction | L | 10 |
| É10.10 | Collapse clause for the two levels | P | 10 |
| É10.11 | The partial global and social prescriptions of expression | L | 10 |
| É10.12 | The change of reader is the test | P | 10 |
| É10.13 | Proposition 6.1: changing reader changes the unconscious | L | 10 |
| É10.14 | The bearer and his mark do not make a reader | L | 10 |
| É10.15 | Herman's sequence principle | F | 10 |
| É11.1 | There always remains something to unfold, and that is structural | L | 11 |
| É11.2 | The unconscious presupposes consciousness | L | 11 |
| É11.3 | Three terms in a strict order; two sources of the unfolded-not | L | 11 |
| É11.4 | Epistemic priority: every datum about the unconscious is a conscious observation | L | 11 |
| É11.5 | An escapement is not an otherness | L | 11 |
| É11.6 | The inhabitant is one too many | L | 11 |
| É11.7 | The consequence in one line | L | 11 |
| É11.8 | The dynamic unconscious is the product of determinate conditions, frequent but not necessary | L (hypothèse) | 11 |
| É11.9 | The somatic route integrated through the fate of its remainder | L | 11 |
| É11.10 | The collapse clause: a single counterexample suffices | P | 11 |
| É11.11 | Knowing oneself becomes a verifiable state, under two conditions | L | 11 |
| É11.12 | The answer by distinction of levels: a non-place before reflexivity | L | 11 |
| É11.13 | Three corrections | L | 11 |
| É11.14 | The answer by the indexer: early trauma reaches the function that produces addresses | L | 11 |
| É11.15 | Schore and early affect regulation | F | 11 |
| É11.16 | Early trauma sets the gain of the loop for life | L | 11 |
| É11.17 | A fifth state: an impaired capacity to produce addresses | L | 11 |
| É11.18 | Early adversity, lowered threshold, multiple inaccessibility | P | 11 |
| É11.19 | Through disgust, carried entirely by the gazing pole | L | 11 |
| É11.20 | The double inversion: of bearer, and of order | L | 11 |
| É11.21 | Two self-disgusts that clinical practice confuses | L | 11 |
| É11.22 | Fall clause of the discriminant | P | 11 |
| É11.23 | Any affect that durably occupies the gazing pole during the construction of the indexer | L | 11 |
| É11.24 | Early co-regulation, one of the best established facts of developmental psychology | F | 11 |
| É11.25 | A calibration is not a sentence | L | 11 |
| É12.1 | The independence criterion, prior to any test | L | 12 |
| É12.2 | Central statement: no dynamic inaccessibility without a documentable impossibility of place | P | 12 |
| É12.3 | P1, separation of the two zeros | P | 12 |
| É12.4 | P2, the agent of the second transition defined by its conditions | P | 12 |
| É12.5 | P3, dependence on the reader | P | 12 |
| É12.6 | P4, condition of production, and accumulation | P | 12 |
| É12.7 | P5, the dense without operator | P | 12 |
| É12.8 | P6, the developmental window | P | 12 |
| É12.9 | P7, the cost of the gaze and the state of the bearer | P | 12 |
| É12.10 | P8, two-position shame | P | 12 |
| É12.11 | P9, the holding of the place | P | 12 |
| É12.12 | P10, the order of positions | P | 12 |
| É12.13 | The discharge instrument | Chantier | 12 |
| É12.14 | The gradation between local and global | Chantier | 12 |
| É12.15 | Measuring the capacity threshold | Chantier | 12 |
| É12.16 | Measuring the indexing function | Chantier | 12 |
| É12.17 | The generality of the operator | Chantier | 12 |
| É12.18 | A four-phase protocol for restoring addresses | Chantier | 12 |
| É12.19 | The word unconscious precedes any clinical practice | F | 12 |
| É12.20 | What the chronology does and does not allow us to conclude | L | 12 |
| É12.21 | The appendix keeps the facts and dismisses the inhabitant | L | 12 |
| É12.22 | Think/No-Think, verified state | F | 12 |
| É12.23 | Independence reservation: the author effect | F | 12 |
| É12.24 | Afzali et al. 2025, an open site and not a support | F | 12 |
| É12.25 | Translation into the language of predictive coding | L | 12 |
| É13.1 | Organic causes aside, panic is a defect of relation | L | 13 |
| É13.2 | The word panic encodes two observer judgments | L | 13 |
| É13.3 | Disproportion is a gap between two modes of evaluation, and it disappears | L | 13 |
| É13.4 | The alarm without object is a documented structural fact (Klein) | F | 13 |
| É13.5 | A distress system dedicated to the rupture of the bond (Panksepp), with its limit | F | 13 |
| É13.6 | Early separation is a recognized risk factor (Bowlby) | F | 13 |
| É13.7 | The four questions that phenomenology imposes | L | 13 |
| É14.1 | The mark versus the wound | L | 14 |
| É14.2 | The two faces of the mark: tension and meaning | L | 14 |
| É14.3 | To read a mark is to fold one face onto the other; it requires an address | L | 14 |
| É14.4 | A subject cannot read alone a mark he is ashamed of | L | 14 |
| É14.5 | The two faces of the subject and self-indexing | L | 14 |
| É14.6 | The unique property of shame, established for half a century | F | 14 |
| É14.7 | Central hypothesis of the text: shame erases the address, not the content | L | 14 |
| É14.8 | Secret, repressed, de-indexed mark (formulation of the text on panic) | L | 14 |
| É14.9 | A short circuit is not a cut | L | 14 |
| É14.10 | Three consequences of the short circuit | L | 14 |
| É14.11 | The depositary third party, third function | L | 14 |
| É14.12 | Why only this affect produces this defect (form of the text on panic) | L | 14 |
| É14.13 | Shame does not hide passively: it feeds and it recruits | L | 14 |
| É14.14 | Socially rewarded allies | L | 14 |
| É14.15 | The decoy address | L | 14 |
| É14.16 | The marker of the true address | P | 14 |
| É14.17 | The false assurance is an honest, untested inference | L | 14 |
| É14.18 | No stages: nothing, then everything | L | 14 |
| É14.19 | The declared strongest have the most brutal attacks; an instrumentation defect | L | 14 |
| É14.20 | The attack is the only admissible form of discharge | L | 14 |
| É14.21 | Shame is an alarm; it is healthy when it can be answered | L | 14 |
| É14.22 | It is not shame that erases the index, it is unreceived shame | L | 14 |
| É14.23 | Two reorderings: the social organ becomes necessary; "defect of relation" is meant literally | L | 14 |
| É15.1 | Inscription | L | 15 |
| É15.2 | Arming | L | 15 |
| É15.3 | Discharge: the schedule drifts | L | 15 |
| É15.4 | The alarm is not false: it is a localization error | L | 15 |
| É15.5 | Reasoning fails by construction | L | 15 |
| É15.6 | Rereading is structurally inaccessible; the work bears first on restoring addresses | L | 15 |
| É15.7 | The sequence principle (Herman 1992) | F | 15 |
| É15.8 | The third party is co-regulator before being reader | L | 15 |
| É15.9 | The neurology of grief as a prediction system (O'Connor) | F | 15 |
| É15.10 | Panic is a grief whose predictive machine can no longer find the field to correct | L | 15 |
| É15.11 | Laboratory-provoked attacks | F | 15 |
| É15.12 | Provocation makes the call; the lowered threshold is a redescription | L | 15 |
| É15.13 | Two old results that separate the two readings | F | 15 |
| É15.14 | What these two results say | L | 15 |
| É15.15 | The honest counterpoint, and what remains open | L | 15 |
| É15.16 | Neuroactive steroids modulate the discharge threshold, with two clarifications | F | 15 |
| É15.17 | Neurosteroid withdrawal as a natural experiment; stable charge and modulated threshold | L | 15 |
| É15.18 | The cost of suppression: the alarm was the last pointer | L | 15 |
| É15.19 | The redirection of the outlet toward self-attack; methodological consequence | L | 15 |
| É16.1 | Persecution, depersonalization, depression, panic | L | 16 |
| É16.2 | Saudade and panic have the same formal structure and differ on a single term, the legibility of the address | L | 16 |
| É16.3 | The structure of anxiety: numerous addresses, but projected | L | 16 |
| É16.4 | Anxious action belongs to management, not resolution | L | 16 |
| É16.5 | A single variable, the address: grief, melancholy, anxiety, panic | L | 16 |
| É16.6 | Conscious panic is addressed | L | 16 |
| É16.7 | Expected and unexpected attacks in the nosography | F | 16 |
| É16.8 | Unexpectedness is a property of the index | L | 16 |
| É16.9 | Comorbidity as consequence; the inverted arrow | L | 16 |
| É16.10 | The double dissociation that would settle it | P | 16 |
| É16.11 | The alarm is the healthy organ; every major grief produces its own panic, addressed | L | 16 |
| É16.12 | The criterion of health is termination | L | 16 |
| É16.13 | Saudade is what an addressed panic becomes when it has finished its work | L | 16 |
| É17.1 | The four mechanisms of the confessional | L | 17 |
| É17.2 | The confessional was an index maintenance device | L | 17 |
| É17.3 | Structural thesis: a system without an indexing organ produces de-indexed marks | L | 17 |
| É17.4 | Online spaces reproduce the position and invert each function | L | 17 |
| É17.5 | The discourse of trivialization merges two operations | L | 17 |
| É17.6 | "Anyone can have one" merges two objects | L | 17 |
| É17.7 | Trivialization is the most effective of the recruited allies | L | 17 |
| É17.8 | An affect can become inexpressible by prescription, and de-indexing becomes a social product | L | 17 |
| É17.9 | Regimes of masculinity; a cost that falls back on men | L | 17 |
| É17.10 | The somatic presentation of distress varies with cultural permissibility | F | 17 |
| É17.11 | The migratory situation accumulates withdrawals | L | 17 |
| É17.12 | A regime that forbids expression fabricates de-indexed marks; the epidemiological question remains open | Chantier | 17 |
| É18.1 | Main statement: restoring addresses versus managing symptoms | P | 18 |
| É18.2 | Secondary statement: the strong form exposed to a single counterexample | P | 18 |
| É18.3 | Statement on provocation: trait or charge, settled by stability | P | 18 |
| É18.4 | Statement on temporality: a latency between arming and discharge | P | 18 |
| É18.5 | Statement on the decoy address: self-understanding without reduction of attacks | P | 18 |
| É18.6 | Statement on false assurance: the most self-sufficient have the shortest prodromes | P | 18 |
| É18.7 | The main open site of the text, settled by the treatise: the other obstacles to rereading | L | 18 |
| É18.8 | The isolated episode and the constituted disorder | Chantier | 18 |
| É18.9 | What research establishes about EMDR | F | 18 |
| É18.10 | What research establishes about exaggeration | F | 18 |
| É18.11 | Pain grows, memory does not; the mind enlarges the memory | L | 18 |
| É18.12 | The fixed resting gaze exaggerates; the moving focus prevents blockage | L | 18 |
| É18.13 | Two readings of the same facts | L | 18 |
| É18.14 | The exact content remains, only the charge drops | P | 18 |
| É18.15 | The size of the memory follows the wounds that came after, not the original severity | P | 18 |
| É18.16 | Holding both terms, not charging to the maximum | P | 18 |
| É19.1 | No available word names the thing; all name something other than it | L | 19 |
| É19.2 | The lexical survey, counted | Th | 19 |
| É19.3 | Every language has named from the side of what is felt, none from the side of the cause | L | 19 |
| É19.4 | A descriptive definition, independent of the thesis | L | 19 |
| É19.5 | The thesis is separated from the definition, which makes the essay testable | L | 19 |
| É19.6 | Why the word grief: by elimination, and by partial convenience | L | 19 |
| É19.7 | Acute nociceptive pain is a signal without propositional content; grief requires having invested | L | 19 |
| É19.8 | Two regimes of resolution: time repairs tissue; grief ceases by rewriting | L | 19 |
| É19.9 | Grief is not disappointed attachment | L | 19 |
| É20.1 | Central thesis: what is lost is never the thing, it is the hope that was deposited in it | L | 20 |
| É20.2 | The quantity of future predicts intensity; density predicts the astonishment of those around | L | 20 |
| É20.3 | Grief is not measured by love | L | 20 |
| É20.4 | Anticipatory grief: a hope moved out before the loss | L | 20 |
| É20.5 | The literature on anticipatory grief | F | 20 |
| É20.6 | The inherited charge: a bond also carries the expected repair of previous ones | L | 20 |
| É20.7 | Freudian deferred action and unresolved early losses (Bowlby) | F | 20 |
| É20.8 | Le modèle de Deuil et mélancolie (1917) | F | 20 |
| É20.9 | First divergence, on the object: the future and not the person; the case of the long agony | L | 20 |
| É20.10 | Second divergence, on the destination: the bond is not to be undone | L | 20 |
| É20.11 | The continuing bonds paradigm | F | 20 |
| É21.1 | The testimony of C. S. Lewis | F | 21 |
| É21.2 | Any theory of grief should explain the gap between phenomenology and received theory | L | 21 |
| É21.3 | Hope is the legibility of the future; its fall produces an alarm of the unknown | L | 21 |
| É21.4 | What the explanation yields without any additional hypothesis | L | 21 |
| É21.5 | The two moments of the alarm: mobilization, then collapse | L | 21 |
| É21.6 | The PANIC/GRIEF system, and the limit of the support | F | 21 |
| É21.7 | Separation anxiety (Bowlby) | F | 21 |
| É21.8 | The false alarm (Klein) | F | 21 |
| É21.9 | The predictive machine (O'Connor) | F | 21 |
| É21.10 | Grief does not flow away, it is learned; what resolves it is the number of prediction errors traversed | L | 21 |
| É21.11 | Grief says "never again" and means "not yet" | L | 21 |
| É21.12 | L’espoir et la crainte dans l’Éthique | F | 21 |
| É21.13 | On indexing: hope is defined by its localization, not by its object | L | 21 |
| É21.14 | On symmetry: a one-way implication | L | 21 |
| É21.15 | On ontological status: existence is temporal through and through (Bloch, Marcel) | L | 21 |
| É21.16 | Ce qui revient à Spinoza : l’acquiescentia in se ipso | L | 21 |
| É22.1 | The four implications of the wound, all false when applied to the psyche | L | 22 |
| É22.2 | The wound metaphor produces a second inscription | L | 22 |
| É22.3 | The debate on prolonged grief disorder (ICD-11, DSM-5-TR) | F | 22 |
| É22.4 | The neural substrate objection does not discriminate: everything that is learned modifies the brain | L | 22 |
| É22.5 | A brain in active reorganization, with the limit of the argument | F | 22 |
| É22.6 | The narrative paradigm of White and Epston | F | 22 |
| É22.7 | The narrative is the map of the future, and a map can be redrawn | L | 22 |
| É22.8 | The collapse of verbal elaboration in acute distress (van der Kolk; Herman) | F | 22 |
| É22.9 | Corrected thesis: rereading is accessible only to a nervous system capable of sustaining it | L | 22 |
| É22.10 | The limit of the concession: an order of operations, not a passivity | L | 22 |
| É23.1 | Sadness in the strong sense is the state of a subject whose griefs have never come down | L | 23 |
| É23.2 | An era that values stacking | L | 23 |
| É23.3 | Melancholy is the deliberate refusal to complete the cycle | L | 23 |
| É23.4 | Le Journal de deuil de Roland Barthes | F | 23 |
| É23.5 | The rightness of melancholy, and its error: it mistakes the guardian of the bond | L | 23 |
| É23.6 | Saudade looks at the same past from a life that goes on | L | 23 |
| É23.7 | The three traits of saudade | L | 23 |
| É23.8 | The clinical practice of grief has moved in this direction for thirty years | F | 23 |
| É23.9 | Saudade is the name one language gave to the destination that clinical practice rediscovered | L | 23 |
| É23.10 | From outside, saudade and melancholy look alike; what separates them cannot be seen from outside | L | 23 |
| É24.1 | It is not the weight of the loss that blocks the cycle, but an obstacle to rereading, and shame is its privileged proximal mechanism | L (hypothèse) | 24 |
| É24.2 | The structural reason: to reread a shameful scene is to sit in the dock | L | 24 |
| É24.3 | The door was closed by someone intelligent; the reflex stayed at its post after the danger | L | 24 |
| É24.4 | Chronicity is better predicted by shame than by the magnitude of the loss | P | 24 |
| É24.5 | Lewis, Tangney and Dearing, Nathanson, Brown | F | 24 |
| É24.6 | Attachment anxiety, the most consistent predictor of the severity of prolonged grief | F | 24 |
| É24.7 | Three answers of increasing scope | L | 24 |
| É24.8 | Psychology measures the faculty of hoping, not the address of hope | L | 24 |
| É24.9 | The protocol for deciding: a mediation test | P | 24 |
| É24.10 | The rereading of a shameful scene cannot be accomplished alone; the first value of the third party is normalization | L | 24 |
| É24.11 | Confession in Foucault | F | 24 |
| É24.12 | Foucault is right against the obligation, he establishes nothing against the function | L | 24 |
| É24.13 | Unaddressed grief, first form of the hypothesis on panic | L | 24 |
| É25.1 | In the grief of love, hope is locked in; hence the asymmetry with job loss | L | 25 |
| É25.2 | Persistent love does not hurt; ceasing to love and ceasing to suffer are independent | L | 25 |
| É25.3 | Reading guard: loving is not reducible to depositing hope | L | 25 |
| É25.4 | Three amplifiers, a single mechanism | L | 25 |
| É25.5 | To heal is to repatriate hope into one's own capacity | L | 25 |
| É25.6 | Snyder's hope theory | F | 25 |
| É25.7 | Captive hope and repatriation translated into Snyder's grammar | L | 25 |
| É25.8 | Frankl and forced repatriation | F | 25 |
| É25.9 | One can remain in a bond out of pure gratitude | L | 25 |
| É25.10 | Simmel, Mauss, Jankelevitch, Ricoeur on gratitude and the gift | F | 25 |
| É25.11 | Gratitude is not traversed, and does not require captivity: what was repaired is paid, not lent | L | 25 |
| É25.12 | Gratitude is paid in gestures, not in years; its right bearing is saudade applied to debt | L | 25 |
| É25.13 | What is lost from a couple is a position of equilibrium | L | 25 |
| É25.14 | Three properties: individual, two-term, silent | L | 25 |
| É25.15 | The fatigue of separation is a permanent expense; repatriation does not give back the lost position | L | 25 |
| É25.16 | Three precautions against a morality of self-sufficiency | L | 25 |
| É25.17 | "He is not crying, so he does not care": the quantity of tears measures nothing | L | 25 |
| É25.18 | "If I stop hurting, I will forget him": gentleness makes the memory lookable | L | 25 |
| É25.19 | "How could he do that to me?": a badly posed question | L | 25 |
| É25.20 | Four honest promises | L | 25 |
| É26.1 | P1, the quantity of future versus value and attachment | P | 26 |
| É26.2 | Operationalization of P1: five indicators and a prediction hierarchy | P | 26 |
| É26.3 | Three corollaries of P1 | P | 26 |
| É26.4 | P1-bis, density and the anticipation gap | P | 26 |
| É26.5 | P2, anticipatory grief | P | 26 |
| É26.6 | P3, shame and chronicity | P | 26 |
| É26.7 | P4, the localization of hope | P | 26 |
| É26.8 | P5, differential efficacy | P | 26 |
| É27.1 | Projection-reflection requires a complete reflection; an amputated return freezes consciousness | L | 27 |
| É27.2 | Identity settles through the painful exploration of its inverse, not through self-affirmation | L | 27 |
| É27.3 | To mature is to recognize that one also carries the inverses one believed foreign | L | 27 |
| É27.4 | Repression as amputation of the reflexive return, without a substantive unconscious | L | 27 |
| É27.5 | Jung and the shadow | F | 27 |
| É27.6 | Frozen consciousness versus operative consciousness | L | 27 |
| É27.7 | Empathy is the extension of projection-reflection to others, not an added virtue | L | 27 |
| É27.8 | Full consciousness and amputated consciousness; the ethics of recognition is not optional | L | 27 |
| É27.9 | Psychopathy read as amputation of projection-reflection onto others | L | 27 |
| É27.10 | The clinical description of psychopathy (Hare) | F | 27 |
| É27.11 | A lead on frozen empathy, referred to the medical work in progress | Chantier | 27 |
| É27.12 | Mirror neurons, with their exact scope | F | 27 |
| É27.13 | The truncated geometry: what were inverses were called opposites | L | 27 |
| É27.14 | The devil as refused inverse, projected and personified | L | 27 |
| É27.15 | Persecutions and ordinary hatred: self-hatred externalized | L | 27 |
| É27.16 | The enemy, the ideological adversary, the foreigner: three scales of one grammar | L | 27 |
| É27.17 | "It is we who are outside ourselves, and whom we refuse to take back." | L | 27 |
| É27.18 | Taking back the outside, by a change of grammar and not by a program | L | 27 |
| É28.1 | What is acquired closes its loop by trial and error; error is the very operation of learning | L | 28 |
| É28.2 | Walking closes its loop by falling | L | 28 |
| É28.3 | Motor development as self-organization (Thelen and Smith) | F | 28 |
| É28.4 | "Well no, that's not me": identity forms through brief and continuous exclusions | L | 28 |
| É28.5 | The child learns by himself, through every direction, until he can read himself | L | 28 |
| É28.6 | Reading oneself: each body has its own walk | L | 28 |
| É28.7 | Empathy is the inscription of the directions explored | L | 28 |
| É28.8 | Why those who have lived through many situations are generally more empathetic | L | 28 |
| É28.9 | Shared walking: learning to walk by watching the other walk while watching us | L | 28 |
| É28.10 | Vygotsky and the zone of proximal development | F | 28 |
| É28.11 | Living through experiences does not become consciousness without absorption | L | 28 |
| É28.12 | Intelligence as a filter that files away before anything is inscribed; erudition can be an obstacle | L | 28 |
| É28.13 | The active refusal to absorb, and adult resistance to change | L | 28 |
| É28.14 | Growing is a modification of the configuration itself; the sage versus the frozen scholar | L | 28 |
| É28.15 | The tourist who confirms | L | 28 |
| É28.16 | The six inscriptions of travel | L | 28 |
| É28.17 | The brief test without appropriation: trying on the shoes gently, then giving them back | L | 28 |
| É28.18 | Travel as an exercise of two-circle consciousness | L | 28 |
| É28.19 | Three anthropologies of the encounter | F | 28 |
Total: Open site 9, F 73, L 299, P 48, Th 1; 430 statements in all.